Analysing the Common Conception that Power Requires Violence and Viceversa

For example, it is widely believed that power and violence form an interrelated relationship, such as people need to exercise violence, just as violence is required to gain power. It is the same as violence. As Mao explains once, Power comes from barrels (Arendt 1972, 113). This article is meant to question this common concept and its discourse. First of all, through Marx, Weber's work to define violence and power, and violence and power cast doubt on what they believe to be two different things. The third violence theory of these articles distinguish between violence and power. Arendt claims that the two concepts are actually opposite though the left and right theorists regard violence as an expression of extreme power. As voluntary compliance supersedes, power comes from collective will and does not require violence to achieve one of its objectives. When the government begins to lose its legitimacy, violence becomes an artificial means for the same purpose, and therefore it can onl y be found without power. Bureaucracy was then defined as an unmanned opponent, and hence reestablished missing relationships with the people they dominated, and thus became the source of ideal violence. Violence brings pain, but violence is not always seen. Understanding traditional violence follows the general approach of showing violence in the form of physical injuries or injuries. The concept of structural violence has been used in the Marxist theorist's vocabulary in analyzing the relationship of class structure, power and labor exploitation. Regardless of whether these people encountered ideologies or beliefs, they are drawn as enemies without even knowing their status. Flaherty painted Narok as a barbarian and drew this hegemonic power. The locals are restricted to one reality, only distorted and reflect only a fraction of the truth, the attacker 's approach seems to be racial discrimination and paranoia. Hegemony is the concept of leadership or control proposed by the rulin g class. In today's society, people think that supremacy is common sense. It is the cultural power proposed by the authorities, not traditional violence or power. The theory was developed by Marxist theory and Antonio Gramsci. Hegemism is based on the Marxist ruling class and the working class theory. Hegemony can be defined as social anomalies. For example, the cultural structure is dominated by the dominant class and is communicated to the working class as common sense. Hegemony is a tool for socially powerful people to exploit cultural influences to adapt classes that are less powerful to a particular social structure or culture, in order to achieve the best interests of powerful people.

Case Discussion Question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Case Discussion Question - Essay Example Providing state of the art technology at a competitive price and with a high value support system, Altera was able to steadily increase its revenues to staggering $1.4 billion by the first quarter of year 2000. Thereafter, the world scenario, regarding the technology boom, took a downward plunge that threw the whole technology industry into a spin. The year 2000 onwards, saw an unexpected decline in the demand for the hi-tech goods that completely wiped out the small players and left the big manufacturing companies with huge inventory that had far too few customers. ‘Chipmakers and PC companies suddenly found themselves with a glut of inventory and capacity. Networking and telecom equipment makers were particularly hard hit; Cisco, more irrationally exuberant than most, was forced to write off a staggering $2.25 billion worth of gear’ (Teach, 2001). Others also followed suit with huge quantity of unsalable inventory. Altera Corporation too faced the repercussion of the time and had to declare goods worth $115 million as unsalable. One can gauge the extent of loss when Nathan Sarkisian, senior vice president of the company said ‘I’ve been in the chip industry for 20 years and I have never seen anything like this’ (article). The reason for this trend may be attributed to a wide variety of causes but the main being that with the large number of electronics manufacturers and suppliers, it became difficult for the customers and distributors to identify ‘who owns which surplus parts’. While at the same time, the grey markets in the networking equipments in the new emerging economies took a new dimension that threatened the whole industries. At this very time, the PC companies became broiled in an unhealthy cut throat competition of waging price wars. The deteriorating market conditions demanded some hard hitting formulae to restrict the decline while at the same time, create effective strategy to counter the menace of such

Policy Making Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Policy Making - Essay Example They will also help in assisting the staffs and the lawmakers in drafting legislation. Lobbying group will interpreted the impact of the proposed rules and legislation. They will organize demonstrations and protest, talking to the media, running advertisement, hosting potential candidates and engaging in litigation. Most of these groups are not shy of offering campaign to the law makers (Rosati & Scott 2014). Other indirect techniques that can be used are, working through third parties. These will help in influencing legislators and public policy. This can be done by making phone call, writing of emails to the members of an organization to communicate their concerns. By use of these techniques, policies will be influenced by the communicated group by offering support. Lobbing groups is more effective than this technique. In a well-funded interest, groups try to gain public support by mass emailing, media advertisement, and publication. The main reason for using these techniques is because they are effective and will create the intended pressure to the public to influence our policies1. Given the current political climate, some of the challenges we intend to face are both economic and political. Politically, providing evidence of or intended policy will be a problem. This because our policies are experimental with no grantee of our intended purpose; Without the evidence, we might fall back on ideology and conventional wisdom. Policies are not made in a vacuum but rather typically emerge from a maelstrom of political energy. Some of the factors that will influence how good the evidence is include the methodology. A good methodology will allow proper consideration of the problem. Another factor is research skills; Good skills will enable excellent research of a problem. Another challenge is that, gathering evidence might take a lot of time. This can